Portland, Oregon – The Oregon appeals court has ruled in favor of the voter-approved gun control law Measure 114, allowing it to potentially take effect after years of being on hold due to a judge’s previous ruling. Measure 114, approved by voters in 2022, aims to restrict sales of certain ammunition magazines and require background checks and permits for gun purchases. However, the law was blocked by a Harney County judge following a lawsuit filed by two residents and national gun rights groups.
A three-judge panel led by Presiding Judge Darlene Ortega concluded that the previous ruling was incorrect and that Measure 114 does not violate the state’s constitution. The decision, outlined in a 25-page opinion, affirmed the constitutionality of the law, paving the way for its potential implementation. Those opposed to the measure have a limited timeframe to contest the appeals court’s ruling, with an appeal to the Oregon Supreme Court anticipated.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, who defended Measure 114, expressed his satisfaction with the court’s decision, emphasizing the importance of implementing “common-sense safety measures” to prevent firearms from falling into the wrong hands and enhance community safety. The law’s supporters were motivated to address issues that have contributed to some of the deadliest mass shootings in recent years, highlighting the significance of measures aimed at curbing gun violence.
Furthermore, the ongoing efforts to enact gun restrictions through legislative channels faced challenges in the past. In 2023, attempts to pass components of Measure 114 in the Oregon Legislature led to a quorum-denying walkout by Republicans. Despite these obstacles, lawmakers are currently considering House Bill 3075, which aims to establish deadlines, fees, and a structured framework for pre-purchase permit applications if Measure 114 comes into effect.
In light of recent events, the decision by the appeals court marks a significant step forward in the implementation of gun safety measures in Oregon. The ruling signals a potential shift towards greater regulation and control over firearm sales and purchases, reflecting the state’s commitment to enhancing public safety in the face of escalating gun violence concerns.