Investigation into Hazelwood School District Finds DEI Not Linked to Violent Attack, Police Confirm

ST. LOUIS, Missouri – The Missouri Attorney General has initiated an investigation into the Hazelwood School District after a violent attack occurred off-campus, leaving a student severely injured. The incident involving 16-year-old Kaylee Gain raised concerns about racial undertones, prompting national attention and calls for scrutiny.

Attorney General Andrew Bailey’s inquiry focused on the school district’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, questioning if they played a role in the altercation. However, law enforcement authorities have refuted any connection between the DEI initiatives and the attack on Gain, stating that DEI programs did not contribute to the violence.

The Hazelwood School District had previously addressed social justice issues, condemning the murder of George Floyd and expressing a commitment to addressing systemic inequalities. The district’s decision to reevaluate its relationship with school resource officers was met with resistance from local police departments, leading to a discontinuation of SRO presence in schools.

Bailey’s allegations against the district regarding the absence of uniformed officers were contested by law enforcement officials, who clarified that the decision to remove SROs was made by police chiefs, not the district. Despite Bailey’s claims, evidence presented by police investigators did not support his assertion of a link between the violent attack and racial diversity initiatives in the district.

Critics, including St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Wesley Bell and Congresswoman Cori Bush, have denounced Bailey’s investigation as politically motivated and potentially harmful to the community. The ongoing controversy has sparked debates about the intersection of school safety, diversity initiatives, and law enforcement practices in the Hazelwood School District.

As the investigation unfolds, stakeholders are closely monitoring the unfolding developments and the potential impact on student safety, community relations, and the broader discourse around racial equity in educational settings. The conflicting narratives and political tensions surrounding the case highlight the complexities of addressing social justice issues and ensuring the well-being of students in school environments.