Jackson County, Missouri – The decision not to press charges in the shooting death of John Bartrom, the owner of Jericho Home Improvements, has left his family dismayed. Bartrom, 46, was fatally shot at a gas station on 63rd and Prospect Avenue in early January. Jackson County Prosecutor Jean Peters Baker cited self-defense as the reason for not pursuing charges, stating that evidence indicated Bartrom had a physical altercation with the shooter before being shot.
Bartrom’s sister, Nora Schwartz, expressed disappointment in the handling of the case, mentioning a lack of communication from authorities. She emphasized the family’s desire for clarity and closure, hoping to see video evidence to better understand the circumstances surrounding Bartrom’s death. Schwartz described her brother as a hardworking individual who deeply loved his children, highlighting his gentle nature in contrast to the reported events leading to his death.
The family’s frustration stems from the belief that the shooter’s narrative was solely relied upon, leaving unanswered questions about Bartrom’s actions that night. Schwartz mentioned that new information surfaced suggesting the shooter was an Uber driver on duty at the time of the incident, further complicating the situation. The invocation of the Castle Doctrine, allowing the shooter to walk free without charges, has raised concerns about justice and accountability in the case.
Missouri’s self-defense law allows individuals to use force, including deadly force, in certain circumstances to protect themselves or others. The statute outlines specific criteria for justifiable use of force, with considerations for avoiding unnecessary harm or escalation. Understanding the legal framework surrounding self-defense in Missouri provides insight into the decision not to prosecute in Bartrom’s case.
As the family continues to seek answers and closure, the unresolved nature of Bartrom’s death underscores the complexities of the legal system’s application of self-defense laws. The case serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by families in navigating the aftermath of a tragic loss, especially when confronted with legal decisions that may not align with their perceptions of justice. The search for truth and accountability remains paramount as loved ones grapple with the reality of Bartrom’s untimely passing.